QUOTE OF THE DAY:

<br />

GLENN BECK AT CPAC 2010: ‘Hello, my name is the Republican Party, and I’ve got a problem. I’m addicted to spending and big government…I’m addicted to spending and I just don’t want to spend today.’ (CLICK HERE FOR LINK TO QUOTE)

"If by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a “Liberal.” ~ John F. Kennedy, 1960

THE NEOCONS DESPISE ME…


VIEW WNI STATS







WordPress Political Blogger

glennbeckbrownshirt


I wonder if Jihad Jane is on Liz Cheney’s payroll? Or maybe they’re the same person?

Dick Cheney when he was vice president of the United States had his own assassination squad. Apparently he never used it. Uh ha. And then there was the time when ole Dickey admitted he signed off on the torturing of people. Dickey kind of likes the idea of killing and torturing people. Hell, his best buddy in the whole entire world, Donald Rumsfeld, was torturing whistleblowers over in Iraq too and I don’t ever remember ole Dickey saying anything about this which tells me he was fine with what Rummy was doing.

Anyway…

Enter Liz Cheney (the devil spawn of ole Dickey) and Jihad Jane. Two peas in a pod these two are! I can’t tell them apart, can you?

lizcheneyjihadjane

Let’s see here….Liz Cheney is protecting her war criminal father and she thinks the Justice Department’s lawyers should DROP DEAD (code for, “My Daddy will kill you!”) and sees the U.S. Constitution like George Bush did as just a goddamn piece of paper. And then there’s Jihad Jane who  also doesn’t care about what the U.S. Constitution says and wants to take up arms and kill those who don’t see it like al-Qaeda (Dick Cheney’s own death squad I believe!) does! See? I think they’re the same person or Liz Cheney has Jihad Jane on the payroll! What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark

Mission Accomplished, yea the other one …….

Mission accomplished
Image Tom Toles

But it weren’t the one bush or cheeneey (H/T Tweety) had in mind ………………..

About sums it all up doesn’t it?

Bin Laden had a plan and the dumb as dirt neo-cons, republiscum and now the bed wetting tea baggers are followin’ it too a Tee,

Too bad he seems much smarter then they are, but his CIA involvement during the Reagan debacle helped bin Laden immensely. (PS we weren’t the only ones)

Bin Laden wanted to draw the US into the same style of war he waged with the CIA help against the Soviets in Afghanistan, a long drawn out battle with mounting casulies till the super power copuldn’t take it any more. Buish did just that and more, the Idiot doubled down in Iraq!!!!!!!

Ole bin Laden couldn’t believe his incredible luck.

Bush the Idiot was too stupid to finish bin forgotten off before beginning a bigger fiasco in Iraq,

Now we have two un-winnable, unfinished wars, to help bin Laden and al qaeda recruit more terrorists while bush the Idiot blew over a trillion of borrowed Chinese dollars in his numb-skull idiotic adventures instead of doing the right thing, using the power and reach of the US to get bin Laden and the rest of the terrorist who actually were behind 9-11,

We all aren’t any safer as the Christmas bomber (re-run of Richard Reid) shows, but bush lost thousands of good troops, had tens of thousands more wounded, wasted over a trillion dollars … PS the grands kids will thanks us for that bill. Now the military is worn out, over extended, with little to show for it, but a grave near Tikrit Iraq, and a huge bill from the borrowed dollars and fresh graves of the fallen.

Heck of a job, you idiots.

Now the bed wetters and rest of the reich wing wants to pile on President Obama for Bush’s incompetency in doing his actual job,
You know, getting the real people behind the attacks, Yes, … actually getting them (dead or alive like Bush claimed he was gonna do) … remember?

He didn’t as soon as March 13, 2002

NOT wasting soldiers lives, bodies or the countries wealth on a pipe dream of the US controlled middle east,(the PNAC wet dream) settling personal scores or obtaining the Iraqi oil fields for US control.

Yep he accomplished his mission, … bin Laden that is, …. and bush/cheeneey couldn’t have been a better supporter for him to that mission if they had actually conspired with Bin laden. (which I don’t believe they did, just were too arrogant, stubborn, and foolish to listen to wiser council, and then have take a more prudent and productive course of action.)

8 1/2 years later and the 9-11 planners are still laughing at the incredible luck they had with the dumbest Supreme Court decision ever ….. who would have though 5 justices of the Supreme Court would have screwed us all over that way, … but they did, … and ole’ bin Laden thanks them for it.

He couldn’t have accomplished as much as he did with out their help either.

  • Share/Bookmark

Good read … with facts no doubt.

This stands on it’s own;

Dick Cheney’s lies about President Obama

by, Eugene Robinson

It’s pathetic to break a New Year’s resolution before we even get to New Year’s Day, but here I go. I had promised myself that I would do a better job of ignoring Dick Cheney’s corrosive and nonsensical outbursts — that I would treat them, more or less, like the pearls of wisdom one hears from homeless people sitting in bus shelters.

But he is a former vice president, which gives him a big stage for his histrionic Rottweiler-in-Winter act. It is never a good idea to let widely disseminated lies and distortions go unchallenged. And the shrill screed that Cheney unloosed Wednesday is so full of outright mendacity that, well, my resolution will have to wait.

In a statement to Politico, Cheney seemed to be trying to provide talking points for opponents of the Obama administration who — incredibly — would exploit the Christmas Day terrorist attack for political gain. Cheney’s broadside opens with a big lie, which he then repeats throughout. It is as if he believes that saying something over and over again, in a loud enough voice, magically makes it so.

“As I’ve watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war,” Cheney begins.

Flat-out untrue.

The fact is that Obama has said many times that we are at war against terrorists. He said it as a candidate. He said it in his inaugural address: “Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.” He has said it since.

As Cheney well knows, unless he has lost even the most tenuous grip on reality, Obama’s commitment to warfare as an instrument in the fight against terrorism has won the president nothing but grief from the liberal wing of his party, with more certainly to come. Hasn’t anyone told Cheney that Obama is sharply boosting troop levels in Afghanistan in an attempt to avoid losing a war that the Bush administration started but then practically abandoned?

Cheney knows this. But he goes on to use the big lie — that Obama is “trying to pretend we are not at war” — to bludgeon the administration on a host of specific issues. Here is the one that jumps out at me: The president, Cheney claims, “seems to think that if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war.”

Interesting that Cheney should bring that up, because it now seems clear that the man accused of trying to blow up Northwest Flight 253, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was given training — and probably the bomb itself, which involved plastic explosives sewn into his underwear — by al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen. It happens that at least two men who were released from Guantanamo appear to have gone on to play major roles as al-Qaeda lieutenants in Yemen. Who let these dangerous people out of our custody? They were set free by the administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

The former vice president expresses his anger that the Obama administration is bringing Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the architect of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, to trial in New York. Cheney is also angry that Obama does not use the phrase “war on terror” all the time, the way the Bush administration used to. But Obama just specifies that we’re at war against a network of terrorists, on the sensible theory that it’s impossible to wage war against a tactic.

Toward the end of his two-paragraph statement, Cheney goes completely off the rails and starts fulminating about how Obama is seeking “social transformation — the restructuring of American society.” Somehow, this is supposed to be related to the president’s alleged disavowal of war — which, of course, isn’t real anyway. It makes you wonder whether Cheney is just feeding the fantasies of the paranoid right or has actually joined the tea-party fringe.

I can find reasons to criticize the administration’s response to the Christmas Day attack. Obama and his team were slow off the mark. Their initial statements were weak. Obama shouldn’t have waited three days to speak publicly, and when he did he should have shown some emotion.

But using a terrorist attack to seek political gain? I have a New Year’s resolution to suggest for Cheney: Ahead of your quest for personal vindication, put country first.

Now when the wingnuts and conservo-tards get their bedwetting panties in a twist, and screech their talking points they have this post to rebut or fail in the talking point idiocy they play with.

But that won’t stop them any more the the facts ever have.

  • Share/Bookmark

Attempted terrorist attack Christmas Day on board a Northwest flight to Detroit, Michigan

Am I worried? Nope, because the passengers jumped the Nigerian man before he could do any damage. We shall never again live in fear thanks to the Bush Regime who used fear on a daily basis to keep us all in line. Maybe that is the only positive to come out of George’s atrocious 8 years!???! My feeling has always been if the terrorists want to kill me while I’m grocery shopping…fine. I hate grocery shopping! :-)

From CBS News:

(CBS/AP) An attempted terrorist attack on a Christmas Day flight began with a pop and a puff of smoke – sending passengers scrambling to subdue a Nigerian man who claimed to be acting on orders from al Qaeda to blow up the airliner, officials and travelers said.

The commotion began as Northwest Airlines Flight 253, carrying 278 passengers and 11 crew members from Amsterdam, prepared to land in Detroit just before noon Friday. Travelers said they smelled smoke, saw a glow, and heard what sounded like firecrackers. At least one person climbed over others and jumped on the man, who officials say was trying to ignite an explosive device.

“It sounded like a firecracker in a pillowcase,” said Peter Smith, a passenger from the Netherlands. “First there was a pop, and then (there) was smoke.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Russian express train bombed today…

bushputintwins

Twenty six people have been declared dead after a Russian express train was bombed. What if Russia blames the United States for it? (Just asking and don’t believe for a second that the United States had anything to do with this act) Seriously, this kind of scenario is what George Bush did after 9/11/01: HE BLAMED IRAQ FOR AN ATTACK IT DIDN’T DO. A strong country will mourn the dead, will rebuild, and then go on with life. Cowardly nations will use an attack as a way to bomb the crap out of a country of it’s choice, invade it, and then capture the country’s resources/riches just so they can line the deep pockets of their cronies! See? What George Bush & Dick Cheney did with 9/11/01 is an abomination. I hope Putin is sober and of sound mind today.

  • Share/Bookmark

The vile hatemongering domestic terrorist Michael Savage now needs Hillary Clinton’s help!

My my my…the right wing fringe of this country has no problem using their microphones everyday across this country to spew their hatred against blacks, women, gays, Jews, those they deem as a minority to themselves, and against the religions that don’t support their own whacked ideologies…all the while acting like a bunch of domestic terrorists….but suddenly when they’re feeling like a “victim”….they want those they’ve denegrated to help them out!

Hey Mike, here’s how Hillary Clinton viewed one of your own. You might want to rethink yourself! Hillary will not be jumping up to help ya let’s just say…

20081125_hillarybushbaby

  • Share/Bookmark

According to conservatives, there has never been a Muslim backlash in our country. See?

glennbeckkillallmuslims__whitenoiseinsanitydotcomphoto

(imagecreatedbyKayInMaineofWhiteNoiseInsanity)

Have you heard Howie Carr, Glenn Beck and other right wingers saying that there has never been a Muslim backlash in our country by Americans? I have and it’s pissing me off, because there has ALWAYS been a backlash to the Muslim community.

After the Oklahoma City Bombing, the Muslims were blamed for the attack or some thought they were behind it:

[emit]…Within two days after the Oklahoma City bombing, there were hundreds of recorded instances of harassment and hate crimes against Muslims, Arabs, Iraqis, people who appeared to be Muslims, and Muslim organizations and buildings. Two days after the explosion, Timothy McVeigh was arrested. But the anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti- Iraqi attacks continued for weeks. 2 One Muslim woman miscarried after an attack. Local Muslims later asked to participate in a mass memorial service led by the Governor. They were refused. However, Muslim delegations from other areas of the country were allowed to attend. The service was entirely Judeo-Christian in format.

Right after 9/11/01 the following happened:

~Six bullets shattered windows of a mosque in Irving, TX. $3,000 in damage was caused.

~A bag filled with blood and labeled ‘Pig’s blood’ was thrown at the door of a mosque in San Francisco, CA.

~Four bricks were thrown through the windows of a Muslim bookstore in Alexandria, VA. Also in Virginia, two mosques reported vandalism.

~On the afternoon of Saturday, 2001-SEP-15, a gunman killed the 49 year old owner of a gas station in Mesa, AZ. He was a Sikh. His family believes that he was killed because he “looked Middle Eastern.” Additional shots were fired at a Lebanese clerk and at the home of an Afghan family.

~The British Broadcasting Commission (BBC) reported that there had been many death threats and assaults against Muslims.

~Two mosques were firebombed with Molotov cocktails during the weekend of OCT-20-21. They are located in Burlington and Mississauga, near Toronto ON Canada. Kendrich House, 35, from Oakville ON has allegedly been charged.

(You can read more about the Muslim backlash in our country ON THIS SITE)

To say that there has never been a backlash is so laughable. What is going on is the right wing of this country hates anyone who is darker than pasty white, but after the Fort Hood massacre (everyone agrees Hasan is a criminal and should go to jail for the rest of his life!), they want us to believe that there isn’t one person in America right now who calls themselves a conservative is not planning something. Oh yes, these are the same people who turned their back when a white conservative walked into a church and killed two liberals. These are the same people who rallied, applauded, and was orgasmic at the killing of Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan after Bush lied to our nation! Seriously, for the conservatives to go on record saying there has never been a backlash against Muslims by Americans ever is just hysterical and their way of removing themselves from their hatred!

Oh please. Fox News right now is drumming up their own hatred towards MUSLIMS in response to the Fort Hood massacre and we all know what will happen in response? Some right wing conservative wacko will retaliate against Muslims! Unfortunately, we can count on it happening. Our nation is not safe with conservatives in it. Muslims are the least of our worries.

  • Share/Bookmark

Joe Lieberman The Nazi to go after American Muslims because killing Iraqi children on behalf of Israel is not enough pleasure for him

collinsliebermanprotectisrael___whitenoiseinsanitydotcomphoto

(ImagedonebyKayInMaineofWhiteNoiseInsanity)

Have I mentioned lately how much I hate today’s Hitler. Yes, that’s right….I hate Joe Lieberman who would kill every American alive on earth to protect his pasty white Israel. He hates all of us. Oh, I know you’re telling yourself right now, “But Kay! I’m a conservative and I love everything Joe says and does! He obviously loves me and my party and is very loyal to the cause!”, but what you’re missing is he is using you knuckleheads to catapult his hateful agenda against the United States on behalf of Israel. See? He would applaud loudly if you died on behalf of Israel and there’s no telling how he would react if he conspired to kill President Obama either! Oh wait. I know how Joe would react if President Obama was gunned down by Israelis. He would blame Iran, applaud loudly at the idea of Americans dying in Iran for Israel, and then he would hold a press conference telling us “how sad he is to hear of the President’s passing”, you know, as if the President died of a heart attack rather than at the end of a Israeli sniper’s bullet.

See? Hitler hated the Jews and now the Jewish Joe hates all Muslims. I bet Joe is a birther too and believes President Obama is a secret Muslim!

Joe has decided to hold Senate hearings in reaction to the Ford Hood massacre, because the man who fired the gun there and who killed 13 has a funny last name and is Muslim. See? Joe doesn’t care what the FBI or the Army has to say about this! Nope. Joe wants to become the Judge and Jury against ALL MUSLIMS ON BEHALF OF ISRAEL. Of course, when he and Susan Collins of Maine under George Bush were the heads of Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, these two did nothing to hold George Bush and his Mafia Thugs accountable for their actions! Nope. The hearings they did hold were laughable. The two of them would ask the witnesses, “Did you do anything wrong?” and when they heard, “Nope!”, they would bang the gavel down on the table and then say, “Okay! Lunchtime!”. Spit.

GO TO HELL JOE LIEBERMAN! You’re a traitor to all of humanity! Your empty shell of a heart is in Israel………SO MOVE THERE PLEASE AND DON’T COME BACK. The fact you’re trying to drum up anti-Muslim sentiment in this country to satisfy your lust is absolutely disgusting!

  • Share/Bookmark

Open Thread…

A good friend of mine is in the hospital and is on life support after a guy he knew for years waited for him to leave his building and then ran him over with his truck! He tried to kill him….and he may succeed. Bail has been set at $1,000,000 right now. Good gawd. I’m telling you 2009 has been an awful year. If Roland doesn’t make it, this will be the 3rd person close to me this year who has died. Seriously, why is life this way sometimes?

No one deserves to be run over with a truck! No one. I don’t care what the reason for doing it is. Good gawd!!!

Anyway….

We’re finding out once again that America’s CIA has the our enemies on the payroll. Isn’t that great? I don’t believe for a second that the CIA & Karzai’s brother joined forces recently. He’s been on the goddamn payroll for years now! Gees.  Liars! Osama bin Laden was on the CIA’s payroll too at one time and when Osama got ill in the summer of 2001 (a couple months before 9/11/01), guess who showed up to his side at the Dubai hospital? Oh that’s right! A CIA agent. If you believe Osama bin Laden is alive, you’re a schmuck. He’s been dead for years and all those “Osama audios” we got the pleasure of listening to were all CIA created just to dupe ya….you stupid American!

I still believe al-Qaida is on Dick Cheney & Donald Rumsfeld’s payroll. Anyone want to dispute this? Let’s not forget it was Ronald Reagan who had the Taliban as guests in his White House back in the 1980’s…

reaganmeetstalibanwhitehouse

And it appears we’re still in the drug business! Thank you CIA and American conservatives! Spit.

What’s on your mind today?

  • Share/Bookmark

“We are spending ourselves into oblivion”

Matthew P. Hoh’s letter in full;

Dear Ambassador Powell,

It is with great regret and disappointment I submit my resignation from my appointment as a Political Officer in the Foreign Service and my post as the Senior Civilian Representative for the U.S. Government in Zabul Province. I have served six of the previous ten years in service to our country overseas, to include deployment as a U.S. Marine officer and Department of Defense civilian in the Euphrates and Tigris River Valleys of Iraq in 2004-2005 and 2006-2007. I did not enter into this position lightly or with any undue expectations nor did I believe my assignment would be without sacrifice hardship or difficulty. However, in the course of my five months of service in Afghanistan, in both Regional Commands East and South, I have lost understanding of and confidence in the strategic purposes of the United States’ presence in Afghanistan. I have doubts and reservations about our current strategy and planned future strategy, but my resignation is based not upon how we are pursuing this war, but why and to what end. To put simply: I fail to see the value or the worth in continued U.S. casualties or expenditures or resources in support of the Afghan government in what is, truly, a 35-year old civil war.

This fall will mark the eighth year of U.S. combat, governance and development operations within Afghanistan. Next fall, the United States’ occupation will equal in length the Soviet Union’s own physical involvement in Afghanistan. Like the Soviets, we continue to secure and bolster a failing state, while encouraging an ideology and system of government unknown and unwanted by its people.

If the history or Afghanistan is one great stage play, the United States is no more than a supporting actor, among several previously, in a tragedy that not only pits tribes, valleys, clans, villages and families against one another, but, from at least the end of King Zahir Shah’s reign, has violently and savagely pitted the urban, secular, educated and modem of Afghanistan against the rural, religious, illiterate and traditional. It is this latter group that composes and supports the Pashtun insurgency. The Pashtun insurgency, which is composed of multiple, seemingly infinite, local groups, is fed by what is perceived by the Pashtun people as a continued and sustained assault, going back centuries, on Pashtun land, culture, traditions and religion by internal and external enemies. The U.S. and NATO presence and operations in Pashtun valleys and villages, as well as Afghan army and police units that are led and composed of non-Pashtun soldiers and police, provide an occupation force against which the insurgency is justified. In both RC East and South, I have observed that the bulk of the insurgency fights not for the white banner of the Taliban, but rather against the presence of foreign soldiers and taxes imposed by an unrepresentative government in Kabul.

The United States military presence in Afghanistan greatly contributes to the legitimacy and strategic message of the Pashtun insurgency. In a like manner our backing of the Afghan government in its current form continues to distance the government from the people. The Afghan government’s failings, particularly when weighed against the sacrifice of American lives and dollars, appear legion and metastatic:

• Glaring corruption and unabashed graft;
• A President whose confidants and chief advisers comprise drug lords and war crimes villains, who mock our own rule of law and counternarcotics efforts;
• A system of provincial and district leaders constituted of local power brokers, opportunists and strongmen allied to the United States solely for, and limited by, the value of our USAID and CERP contracts and whose own political and economic interests stand nothing to gain from any positive or genuine attempts at reconciliation; and
• The recent election process dominated by fraud and discredited by low voter turnout, which has created an enormous victory for our enemy who now claims a popular boycott and will call into question worldwide our government’s military, economic and diplomatic support for an invalid and illegitimate Afghan government.

Our support for this kind of government, coupled with a misunderstanding of the insurgency’s true nature, reminds me horribly of our involvement with South Vietnam; an unpopular and corrupt government we backed at the expense of our Nation’s own internal peace, against an insurgency whose nationalism we arrogantly and ignorantly mistook as a rival to our own Cold War ideology.

I find specious the reasons we ask for bloodshed and sacrifice from our young men and women in Afghanistan. If honest, our stated strategy of securing Afghanistan to prevent al-Qaeda resurgence or regrouping would require us to additionally invade and occupy western Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, etc. Our presence in Afghanistan has only increased destabilization and insurgency in Pakistan where we rightly fear a toppled or weakened Pakistani government may lose control of nuclear weapons. However, again, to follow the logic of our stated goals we should garrison Pakistan, not Afghanistan. More so, the September 11th attacks, as well as the Madrid and London bombings, were primarily planned and organized in Western Europe; a point that highlights the threat is not one tied to traditional geographic or political boundaries. Finally, if our concern is for a failed state crippled by corruption and poverty and under assault from criminal and drug lords, then if we bear our military and financial contributions to Afghanistan, we must reevaluate our commitment to and involvement in Mexico.

Eight years into war, no nation has ever known a more dedicated, well trained, experienced and disciplined military as the U.S. Armed Forces. I do not believe any military force has ever been tasked with such a complex, opaque and Sisyphean mission as the U.S. military has received in Afghanistan. The tactical proficiency and performance of our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines is unmatched and unquestioned. However, this is not the European or Pacific theaters of World War II, but rather is a war for which our leaders, uniformed, civilian and elected, have inadequately prepared and resourced our men and women. Our forces, devoted and faithful, have committed to conflict in an indefinite and unplanned manner that has become a cavalier, politically expedient and Pollyannaish misadventure. Similarly, the United States has a dedicated and talented cadre of civilians, both U.S. government employees and contractors, who believe in and sacrifice for their mission, but have been ineffectually trained and led with guidance and intent shaped more by the political climate in Washington, D.C. than in Afghan cities, villages, mountains and valleys.

“We are spending ourselves into oblivion” a very talented and intelligent commander, one of America’s best, briefs every visitor, staff delegation and senior officer. We are mortgaging our Nation’s economy on a war, which, even with increased commitment, will remain a draw for years to come. Success and victory, whatever they may be, will be realized not in years, after billions more spent, but in decades and generations. The United States does not enjoy a national treasury for such success and victory.

I realize the emotion and tone of my letter and ask you excuse any ill temper. I trust you understand the nature of this war and the sacrifices made by so many thousands of families who have been separated from loved ones deployed in defense of our Nation and whose homes bear the fractures, upheavals and scars of multiple and compounded deployments. Thousands of our men and women have returned home with physical and mental wounds, some that will never heal or will only worsen with time. The dead return only in bodily form to be received by families who must be reassured their dead have sacrificed for a purpose worthy of futures lost, love vanished, and promised dreams unkept. I have lost confidence such assurances can anymore be made. As such, l submit my resignation.

Sincerely,

Matthew P. Hoh
Senior Civilian Representative
Zabul Province, Afghanistan

cc:
Mr. Frank Ruggiero
Ms. Dawn Liberi
Ambassador Anthony Wayne
Ambassador Karl Eikenberry

This letter was addressed to:
Ambassador Nancy J. Powell
Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW

About sums up the failures of Bush and Cheney for the last eight years, and why Obama shouldn’t send in new cannon fodder to the failed war Bush already lost.

  • Share/Bookmark