QUOTE OF THE DAY:
GLENN BECK AT CPAC 2010:
‘Hello, my name is the Republican Party, and I’ve got a problem. I’m addicted to spending and big government…I’m addicted to spending and I just don’t want to spend today.’
(CLICK HERE FOR LINK TO QUOTE)
"If by a “Liberal” they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people — their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, and their civil liberties — someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a “Liberal,” then I’m proud to say I’m a “Liberal.” ~ John F. Kennedy, 1960
|
This stands on it’s own;
Dick Cheney’s lies about President Obama
by, Eugene Robinson
It’s pathetic to break a New Year’s resolution before we even get to New Year’s Day, but here I go. I had promised myself that I would do a better job of ignoring Dick Cheney’s corrosive and nonsensical outbursts — that I would treat them, more or less, like the pearls of wisdom one hears from homeless people sitting in bus shelters.
But he is a former vice president, which gives him a big stage for his histrionic Rottweiler-in-Winter act. It is never a good idea to let widely disseminated lies and distortions go unchallenged. And the shrill screed that Cheney unloosed Wednesday is so full of outright mendacity that, well, my resolution will have to wait.
In a statement to Politico, Cheney seemed to be trying to provide talking points for opponents of the Obama administration who — incredibly — would exploit the Christmas Day terrorist attack for political gain. Cheney’s broadside opens with a big lie, which he then repeats throughout. It is as if he believes that saying something over and over again, in a loud enough voice, magically makes it so.
“As I’ve watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war,” Cheney begins.
Flat-out untrue.
The fact is that Obama has said many times that we are at war against terrorists. He said it as a candidate. He said it in his inaugural address: “Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.” He has said it since.
As Cheney well knows, unless he has lost even the most tenuous grip on reality, Obama’s commitment to warfare as an instrument in the fight against terrorism has won the president nothing but grief from the liberal wing of his party, with more certainly to come. Hasn’t anyone told Cheney that Obama is sharply boosting troop levels in Afghanistan in an attempt to avoid losing a war that the Bush administration started but then practically abandoned?
Cheney knows this. But he goes on to use the big lie — that Obama is “trying to pretend we are not at war” — to bludgeon the administration on a host of specific issues. Here is the one that jumps out at me: The president, Cheney claims, “seems to think that if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al Qaeda-trained terrorists still there, we won’t be at war.”
Interesting that Cheney should bring that up, because it now seems clear that the man accused of trying to blow up Northwest Flight 253, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was given training — and probably the bomb itself, which involved plastic explosives sewn into his underwear — by al-Qaeda operatives in Yemen. It happens that at least two men who were released from Guantanamo appear to have gone on to play major roles as al-Qaeda lieutenants in Yemen. Who let these dangerous people out of our custody? They were set free by the administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.
The former vice president expresses his anger that the Obama administration is bringing Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the architect of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, to trial in New York. Cheney is also angry that Obama does not use the phrase “war on terror” all the time, the way the Bush administration used to. But Obama just specifies that we’re at war against a network of terrorists, on the sensible theory that it’s impossible to wage war against a tactic.
Toward the end of his two-paragraph statement, Cheney goes completely off the rails and starts fulminating about how Obama is seeking “social transformation — the restructuring of American society.” Somehow, this is supposed to be related to the president’s alleged disavowal of war — which, of course, isn’t real anyway. It makes you wonder whether Cheney is just feeding the fantasies of the paranoid right or has actually joined the tea-party fringe.
I can find reasons to criticize the administration’s response to the Christmas Day attack. Obama and his team were slow off the mark. Their initial statements were weak. Obama shouldn’t have waited three days to speak publicly, and when he did he should have shown some emotion.
But using a terrorist attack to seek political gain? I have a New Year’s resolution to suggest for Cheney: Ahead of your quest for personal vindication, put country first.
Now when the wingnuts and conservo-tards get their bedwetting panties in a twist, and screech their talking points they have this post to rebut or fail in the talking point idiocy they play with.
But that won’t stop them any more the the facts ever have.

Well, I’m not going to freak out about this because the House has a strong public option in theirs and I know Nancy Pelosi will guard it with everything she’s got….including her vagina if she has to! LOL
I’m sure you’ve heard the right wingers spouting recently that after 6 months of President Obama being in the White House Americans are completely doing away with the Democratic Party and are rushing to the republic party now. They’re basing their ‘facts’ on a Gallop Poll entitled…
Political Ideology: “Conservative” Label Prevails in the South
Conservatives outnumber liberals in nearly every state, but not in D.C.
This is all the “proof” the neocons need to be able to go around the country now “to prove” that the violent minority in this country (conservatives) are who Americans want in charge!
From the same poll (emphasis mine):
These findings are based on Americans’ answers to a question asking whether their political views are very conservative, conservative, moderate, liberal, or very liberal. The data come from Gallup Daily tracking in the first half of 2009, encompassing interviews with more than 160,000 U.S. adults, with a minimum of 400 interviews for each state (and 300 in the District of Columbia).
Only 400 people of each state over the course of 6 months total was asked if they their thinking was more liberal or conservative! Yeah, yeah, out of 300 million people, it’s the 20,000 (plus the 300 polled in Washington, DC!) that makes all the difference and are the final nail in the Democrat’s coffin!! And the 140,000 other adults that Gallop can’t say for sure were or were not interviewed for this poll? Pay no attention! Did they guess? Maybe! This could be why Gallop reported the following at the end of their article:
“In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.”
Here’s the polling map created by Gallop to show the breakdown of the states and where they stand:

Can we add up the population of the “Most Conservative/More Conservative” states and compare them to the “Somewhat Conservative/Less Conservative/Liberal” states please!!! This poll was obviously designed to give the violent right wingers an edge, because honestly, when you read the data info and you look at this map, it appears that the conservative movement is still flat on it’s face!
This is why I really hate polls, because they can be easily manipulated for a preferred outcome. We all know the right wingers love using numbers & percentages too to dupe their supporters. I can’t remember the republican representative’s name that came on Glenn Beck’s show a couple months ago to chit chat, but he was throwing out percentages and numbers left and right and it was almost impossible to understand what he was saying and to follow along. Well, that’s what the right wingers do. They set out to confuse as this current Gallop poll indicates. Confusion and fear is all they know.
I say, just ignore the polls. Talk to your neighbors and family instead to get a better idea of what is happening in your own state. Let’s put it this way, the republicans in my state still don’t have any enthusiasm despite what the right wing talk show hosts would like for us to believe. The following photo was taken by the Chair of the Oxford County Democrats within the last week or two at a town market. She explained that this table looked like this for most of the day….

LOL! See? She said at one point a republican market-goer got a piece of candy for stopping by this table, but he said he never got his question answered! Nice.
Here is an honest argument about the health care debate .
It explains how and why the republicans and their corporate masters are willing to under cut the attempt at finally fixing our failed system.
“Universal” health care plans have been running in many rich western countries for decades, and while there are no perfect systems, and cost pressures build up there as well, the satisfaction level to date is generally high, much higher than in the US. While at the same time the costs of these systems are way lower than anything the US has been able to come up with. So why the extensive talk, why does the US need to re-invent the wheel? Just look around and pick a tried and true system, like Norway, France, Germany. They’re all cheaper and they all function better. And if you don’t believe that, ask yourself why none of these countries is presently involved in exasperating talks about their systems.
So why does Washington try to invent the wheel? The answer is easy. The difference between US and Western European health care lies exclusively in the political power acquired by corporate industries, in this case -mainly- a combination of drug manufacturers (closely linked to the chemical industry) and insurance companies (which are in turn closely linked to Wall Street banks). The US needs to fabricate its own system because it needs to satisfy the perverted influence industry has on not just health care itself, but also on the political process.
US health care spending is over 15% of GDP, and within 10 years it will be 20% (there’s your bubble). That means today’s dollar total is about $2.2 trillion (that’s Britain’s entire GDP), and we’re on our way to $3 trillion. If the US would adopt a Western European system, it might save 50% of these costs. And a few very powerful corporations would lose $1 trillion per year in revenues. That’s all you need to know about the reason why there will be no significant reform. Sick people are big business. And big business runs the nation.
Ilargi: Automatic earth
Simple when you think about it.
We are the ones saying OUR system is broken
Not the Canadians,
Not the British,
Not the French,
Not the Germans,
Not the Swedish,
Not the Norwegians,
Not the Swiss;
No matter how much the reich wing maligns the foreign health care systems, with their RNC talking points, it is the USA not the other countries who is working to fix a severely flawed system, which is failing many many American citizens when they need it the most.
The right can’t admit that so they try to stifle the facts with buzz words like socialism, government mandated care, fear mongering thru total outright fabrications like the government is gonna kill old people or make it harder to get care. They claim the changes will take away what they people have now and replace it with a system they claim doesn’t work. Or that the government is going to micromanage which doctor you can see, and what care that particular doctor can give.
The right claim a modern government run system can’t work, even though the rest of the modern nations in Europe and Canada have it. Even here in the United States more people receive their health care from government sponsored insurance sources, Medicaid, Medicare, Government employees insurance , and of course the government run systems Military health care and the Veterans Administration; then through a private health care insurance system.
One of the truly amazing and depressing things about the health reform debate is the persistence of fear-mongering over “socialized medicine” even though we already have a system in which the government pays substantially more medical bills (47% of the total) than the private insurance industry (35%).
Paul Krugman
Which means what is being proposed is not socialized medicine, but socialized insurance. In socialized medicine the doctors and hospitals are owned and directly financed from the government,
The VA and military systems are the only thing we really have that comes close, and for the most part they receive ratings above the private sector. All but the British are single payer public insurance systems, or some form of that system, where the doctors remain in the private sector, and receive payments from the government run insurance system. Only the British is an actual government run health care system where the doctors work directly for the government.
However for some reason the republicans and right wing fight tooth and nail against what seems to work very well for the rest of the world. They are trying to preserve our system where we spend more money and end up with 47 million uninsured, people losing their insurance when they need it the most. Other people with pre-existing conditions not even being able to get insurance because that cuts into the bottom line. People worried about their health care and how to pay for it, and of course the hundred of thousands of people who lose everything due to illness and the costs here in the USA.
The reason is simple; the more control the large corporations have the more profits they make. It is really about corporate profits in the end. The more the government makes sure care like the veterans and congress critters get, is provided to the rest of America, the less corporate profit can be skimmed off the top before any “care” is ever considered by the Insurance and Pharmaceutical corporations. So each time any suggestion of fixing the system, the health care corporate industrial conglomerates spend many millions mis-informing, fear mongering, and handing large amounts of money to certain politicians to stop reform, all in the name of ever higher profits.
It really is that simple
Their profits mean more to them, then our health, and they want the system to stay that way.

When George Bush was doubling the national debt to the amount of $12 TRILLION dollars over the years he was the Fuhrer, the republicans in this country remained silent. When Enron crashed and George Bush didn’t demand regulations be put in place to make sure something like that never happened again, they applauded.
When he was torturing prisoners all over the planet in secret prisons, they remained silent.
When tax cuts were going to the uber wealthy and their paychecks didn’t increase, they lost their job, and their home, they were fine with it and remained silent.
When AIG decided in April of 2008 to give $400 million in bonuses to their employees that year and in Sept/Oct 2008 when the company started to crash, the employees in the financial product department (WHERE THE HEAD OF THE CREDIT DEFAULT/DERIVITIES PIG LIVES) got their bonuses anyway at the end of 2008 and more today, even after we, the American government, bailed this company out to the tune of $150 billion, the right wingers remained silent.
When the stock market would plummet 800 points on a day under George Bush in his last year, they said it was a correction. And when the stock market went from 14,000 points to under 8,000 points by the time George Bush left office, again, they remained silent, didn’t care, and said it was just the market fixing itself.
When the stock market goes up today, it’s because of George Bush’s brilliance too! Spit.
Oh, but now that we have a president who has dark skin and who is trying to fix the George Bush Shit Pile that can still be seen by satellite, President Obama is being blamed for everything George Bush did and didn’t do!
But don’t worry. We’ve got conservadems to the rescue! They’re going to save us! Yeah, yeah, as I stated on FireDogLake before the November election last year, “don’t worry about voting for Obama because the Democrats will have him impeached within the first year over something stupid”. It’s true. This is how some Democrats are….either online, in the Congress and in our lives. To make themselves feel all tough and brilliant, they will band themselves to the backs of the neocons which is so funny because the neocons are not tough nor are they brilliant. After 8 years of George Bush giving him everything he wanted without interruption and without debate, they’ve (the republicans and conservadems) now decided George Bush should not be held accountable for his mess and are now banning with the republicans and chanting, “President Obama is the worst president in the history of our nation!!!!!”.
President Obama has been in office for 2 months and even when you point out to the imbeciles of both parties that their hatred is unwarranted at this point because it’s too freaking early for it and the shit pile is too big to fix in this short amount of time, they don’t care! They don’t want to hear it and they run away with their fingers in their ears screaming, “La lalalala la!”.
So, I’m going to sit back and watch what happens. Guaranteed President Obama will be impeached (or they’ll try to) this year and the neocons who hate blacks will be ecstatic, because we all know this is the real reason why they hate and despise Obama and they’ve been looking for any excuse to go after him. Now that they have the conservadems on their side, they will succeed! Yeah, yeah, they will succeed in blaming President Obama for George Bush’s shit pile. I’m sure the next time Dick Cheney blames President Obama for making our nation unsafe after two months (which is outright bullshit!), they will all squeal with delight! Because they’re all good little jackboot licking Piggies.
Assholes. All of ya.
|
|
Spits of rage…