I have no idea where texasig’s comment went. It wasn’t in the spam catcher at all.

Saddam did NOT have what Bush and Cheney dishonestly claimed he had before they illegally invaded a country which also had nothing to do directly with 9-11.

Sorry to burst your ideological bubble on this one.

Googling for articles from the very early invasion period, won’t help ya cause after an exhaustive search

U.S. ‘Almost All Wrong’ on Weapons
Report on Iraq Contradicts Bush Administration Claims

Charles A. Duelfer, whom the Bush administration chose to complete the U.S. investigation of Iraq’s weapons programs, said Hussein’s ability to produce nuclear weapons had “progressively decayed” since 1991. Inspectors, he said, found no evidence of “concerted efforts to restart the program.”

The findings were similar on biological and chemical weapons. While Hussein had long dreamed of developing an arsenal of biological agents, his stockpiles had been destroyed and research stopped years before the United States led the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Duelfer said Hussein hoped someday to resume a chemical weapons effort after U.N. sanctions ended, but had no stocks and had not researched making the weapons for a dozen years.

Duelfer’s report, delivered yesterday to two congressional committees, represents the government’s most definitive accounting of Hussein’s weapons programs, the assumed strength of which the Bush administration presented as a central reason for the war. While previous reports have drawn similar conclusions, Duelfer’s assessment went beyond them in depth, detail and level of certainty.

“We were almost all wrong” on Iraq, Duelfer told a Senate panel yesterday.

Bush Inflated Threat From Iraq’s Banned Weapons, Report Says

President Bush and top administration officials repeatedly exaggerated what they knew about Iraq’s weapons and its ties to terrorist groups as the White House pressed its case for war against Iraq, the Senate intelligence committee said yesterday in a long-awaited report.

While most of the administration’s prewar claims about Iraq reflected now-discredited U.S. intelligence reports, the White House crossed a line by conveying certainty about the threat that Saddam Hussein posed to the United States.

Sorry, but the truth is, Bush and Cheney knowingly deceived the American people for a war they both wanted for their reasons, however the war was NOT justified by the discredited claims they made.

(COMMENT BY CLIF OF WNI: relevant paragraph;

Sorry but just using headlines which are NIOT supported by the actual article won’t work._)

(COMMENT FRO CLIF OF WNI: From the article

nuff said)

Saying Saddam had yellow cake so he was gonna build a nuke is a out right lie.

Either the reich wingers are so stupid they do not know the difference, or so dishonest they don’t care.

Saddam was no closer to actually building a bomb in 2003 with this yellow cakle then sarah palin was to moving to the Naval Observatory last fall. Cheney just plain LIED

Both were reich wing dreams with no connection to reality.

http://crooksandliars.com/2008/07/06/yellowcake-uranium-found-in-iraq-bush-was-right-well-not-so-much

According to international law, Saddam Hussein had this stuff legally. He did not have the capability to make it into a weapon of mass destruction. George Bush said he did have the capability and said he could attack our country in 45 minutes in the form of a mushroom cloud. He lied.